BJMO - volume 13, issue 7, november 2019
Ir A. Hébrant PhD, M. Lammens MD, PhD, C. Van den Broecke MD, N. D’Haene MD, PhD, J. Van den Oord MD, PhD, A. Vanderstichele MD, PhD, A. Dendooven MD, PhD, P. Neven MD, PhD, K. Punie MD, G. Floris MD, PhD, J. Van der Meulen MD, HA. Poirel MD, PhD, C. Dooms MD, PhD, S. Rottey MD, PhD, T. Boterberg MD, PhD, L. Brochez MD, PhD, M.C. Burlacu MD, G. Costante MD, D. Creytens MD, PhD, P. De Paepe MD, PhD, R. De Pauwn MD, B. Decallonne MD, PhD, F. Dedeurwaerdere MD, H. Denys MD, PhD, L. Ferdinande MD, PhD, R. Forsyth MD, PhD, M. Garmyn MD, PhD, T. Gevaert MD, PhD, J. De Grève MD, PhD, E. Govaerts MD, E. Hauben MD, PhD, J. Kerger MD, O. Kholmanskikh Van Criekingen MD, PhD, V. Kruse MD, PhD, Y. Lalami MD, L. Lapeire MD, PhD, P. Lefesvre MD, PhD, J.P. Machiels MD, PhD, B. Maes MD, PhD, G. Martens MD, PhD, M. Remmelink MD, PhD, I. Salmon MD, PhD, R. Sciot MD, PhD, S. Tejpar MD, PhD, K. Van de Vijver MD, PhD, L. Van de Voorde MD, I. Van den Berghe MD, A. Van den Bruel MD, K. Vandecasteele MD, PhD, L. Vanwalleghem MD, K. Vermaelen MD, PhD, R. Salgado MD, PhD, E. Wauters MD, PhD, B. Weynand MD, PhD, E. Van Valckenborgh PhD, G. Raicevic PhD, M. Van den Bulcke PhD, P. Pauwels MD, PhD
In order to advise the Federal Government on the reimbursement of molecular tests related to Personalised Medicine in Oncology, the Commission of Personalised Medicine (ComPerMed), represented by Belgian experts, has developed a methodology to classify molecular testing in oncology. The different molecular tests per cancer type are represented in algorithms and are annotated with a test level reflecting their relevance based on current guidelines, drug approvals and clinical data. The molecular tests are documented with recent literature, guidelines and a brief technical description. This methodology was applied on different solid tumours for which molecular testing is a clear clinical need.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2019;13(7):286–95)
Read moreBJMO - volume 9, issue 7, december 2015
M. Le Mercier PhD, N. De Nève MSc, O. Blanchard MSc, M. Remmelink MD, PhD, B. Weynand MD, PhD, I. Salmon MD, PhD, N. D’Haene MD, PhD
The successes of targeted agents in patients with molecularly defined tumours and improvements in genomic technology have generated enthusiasm for incorporating genomic profiling into clinical cancer practice and molecular testing has now become a standard of care for lung cancer. International guidelines recommend testing for EGFR mutations and ALK gene rearrangement to guide patient selection for therapy. However, different potentially targetable oncogenes, such as KRAS, PIK3CA, BRAF, ERBB2 or MET, for which agents are being evaluated, have been proposed as valuable for managing patients with lung cancer. Recently, the development of next generation sequencing has enabled simultaneous detection of many clinically relevant mutations in different genes in a single test. In this study, we have evaluated the clinical utility of targeted next generation sequencing, using a 22 genes panel, for patients with lung cancer on 234 samples, including cytology, biopsies and surgical resections, from two different institutions tested in routine daily practice since validation and accreditation of the method (BELAC ISO15189). On the 234 samples tested, only one case could not be sequenced due to an insufficient quantity of available tissue. Among the 233 cases tested, 223 (95.7%) samples were sequenced successfully. The median turnaround time between reception of the sample in the laboratory and report release was one week. The most frequent mutations were found in TP53 (42.1%) and KRAS (35.9%). Of successfully sequenced cases, 137 potentially actionable mutations were identified in 130 patients (58.3%), including 80 KRAS mutations, 26 EGFR mutations, fourteen BRAF mutations, eight PIK3CA mutations, three PTEN mutations, two ERBB2 insertions, two NRAS mutations and two MAP2K1 mutations. Overall, next generation sequencing can be applied in daily practice even for small samples, such as lung biopsies or cell blocks. Moreover, it provides clinically relevant information for lung cancer patients.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2015;9(7):272–78)
Read more
Top
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
