BJMO - volume 17, issue 7, november 2023
M. De Wit MD, L-A-F. Clifton MD, E. Beuckelaers MD, J. Desimpelaere MD, D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
This article presents the case of a 35-year-old patient with a glomus tumour in the fourth digit of the right hand. The patient had a history of a bilateral embryonal testicular carcinoma, which was treated with surgery and chemotherapy. The initial complaints consisted of pain in all the fingers on the right hand, suspected of Raynaud phenomenon. Finally, the diagnosis was made clinically and through magnetic resonance imaging. He underwent surgery to remove the tumour, and the diagnosis was pathologically confirmed. The treatment was curative, and the complaint of pain resolved.
(Belg J Med Oncol 2023;17(7):264–6)
Read moreBJMO - volume 17, issue 3, may 2023
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Burnout is an important consequence of work-related stress. It is observed in 15–40% of resident physicians and has an important influence on their wellbeing, their professional career, and their patient-doctor relationship. Different interventions at the organisational, interpersonal and personal levels can be performed to prevent the development of burnout.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2023;17(3):85–7)
Read moreBJMO - volume 17, issue 2, march 2023
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Cisplatin has been the backbone of the treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, both in recurrent/metastatic settings and in patients with locoregional disease. In patients with recurrent/metastatic disease and a combined positivity score (CPS) ≥20, cisplatin can be replaced by pembrolizumab. In patients with locoregional disease and treated with definitive chemoradiation or in the adjuvant setting, the 3-weekly high-dose cisplatin can be replaced by the weekly 40 mg/m2 cisplatin regimen.
(Belg J Med Oncol 2023;17(2):52–7)
Read moreBJMO - volume 17, issue 1, january 2023
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
The quality of oncological care can be ensured by different means, such as graduate and postgraduate education, guidelines, quality labels and audits. Audits in medical oncology departments are not routinely performed and are only used in case of problems. In this article, the introduction of audits in the medical oncology department is advocated, and a strategy to implement this quality improving tool is proposed.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2023;17(1):19–26)
Read moreBJMO - volume 17, issue 1, january 2023
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
Patients developing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are in most instances pre-treated with androgen deprivation treatment and a newer androgen receptor-targeting agent in the metastatic castration-sensitive setting.
In this article, I discuss the first- and second-line treatment options in this patient population.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2023;17(1):15–8)
Read moreBJMO - volume 16, issue 7, november 2022
M. Wyckmans BSc, S. Mignon MD, N. Blockx MD, D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
The cancer antigen 15.3 (CA-15.3) is an important tumour marker for the evaluation of patients with a history of breast cancer. An increase of CA-15.3 can be a sign of breast cancer recurrence and warrants further investigation. However, CA-15.3 is not specific and can be elevated in several oncological and benign conditions. This case describes a megaloblastic anaemia due to folic acid deficiency and elevated CA-15.3 in a patient with a history of breast cancer. No signs of breast cancer recurrence were found, and serum CA-15.3 levels normalised after supplementation of folic acid. Benign causes of CA-15.3 elevation should be considered when evaluating a patient with a history of breast cancer.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2022;16(6):360–2)
Read moreBJMO - volume 16, issue 7, november 2022
D. Schrijvers MD, PhD
New anticancer drugs are continuously developed and show statistically significant differences compared to the standard treatment. However, their clinical impact is not always shown. In this review, two systems to evaluate the meaningful clinical benefit are discussed: the ESMO-MCBS, developed by ESMO, and the ASCO value framework, proposed by ASCO. Both systems evaluate clinical meaningful effects of new anticancer drugs based on available clinical research, and grade them according to the system they developed. Whereas the ESMO-MCBS is a tool directed to guide development and health care system professionals, the ASCO value framework is a tool to help the medical oncologist and the patient to make an informed decision in relation to the value of a new treatment, including costs.
(BELG J MED ONCOL 2022;16(7):355–9)
Read moreTo provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.