Cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer.1 Abemaciclib has been at the forefront of this therapeutic revolution and, compared to the other two available CDK4/6 inhibitors, this agent comes with some unique pharmacological and pharmacokinetic features. First, abemaciclib is administered on a continuous daily schedule, which allows for a sustained target inhibition and a durable cell-cycle blockage.2 Furthermore, abemaciclib is the only CDK4/6 inhibitor that is able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and intracranial objective responses have been observed with this agent.3 In addition, abemaciclib comes with a broad therapeutic index, which allows physicians to lower the dose without impacting the treatment efficacy.4 Finally, abemaciclib displays significantly less drug-drug interactions compared to palbociclib and ribociclib, making it an interesting drug to use in a patient population with frequent comorbidities or polypharmacy.4 Also the interesting interaction profile allows it to be combined with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting.5 The clinical potential of abemaciclib in the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer has been convincingly demonstrated in different large-scale, randomized-controlled phase III trials, both in the early (MonarchE) and advanced setting (MONARCH-2 & -3).6-8
MonarchE recruited a total of 5,637 patients with high-risk node- positive HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (EBC). Cohort 1 of the study (91% of the patients) included patients with high risk based on clinical pathological features (≥4 nodes or 1-3 nodes with grade 3 disease or a tumor size ≥5 cm). A second, smaller exploratory cohort (9% of the patients) enrolled patients with intermediate risk factors (e.g., 1-3 positive nodes, grade 1-2 disease, T1-T2 tumors), but a high cell proliferation (Ki-67 ≥20%). As the current EMA label for abemaciclib in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC is limited to the patient profile in cohort 1, cohort 2 will not be discussed here. Following standard of care treatment in the EBC setting, patients in the trial were randomized (1:1) to receive at least 5 years of ET with or without abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) for 2 years.6
After a median follow-up of 54 months, at which point more than 80% of patients were already more than 24 months beyond their 2 years of abemaciclib in the EBC setting, abemaciclib + ET was associated with a significant benefit in invasive disease free survival (iDFS, primary endpoint) compared to ET alone (HR[95%CI]: 0.670[0.588-0.764]). Interestingly, The Kaplan Meier curves for iDFS continue to separate over time, with a continuous deepening in the absolute improvement in iDFS rates (difference 7.9% at 5 years, 83.2% vs. 75.3%).6 Also in terms of distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) the addition of abemaciclib to ET led to a significant improvement (HR[95%CI]: 0.665[0.577-0.765]), with an absolute benefit in 5-year DRFS rate of 7.1% (85.6% vs. 78.5%). At the time of the most recent analysis of MonarchE, data for overall survival (OS) were still immature, but revealed a numerical benefit in favor of abemaciclib + ET compared to ET alone (197 vs. 223 deaths, [HR[95%CI]: 0.894[0.738-1.084]). Given the higher number of patients living with metastatic disease in the ET alone arm compared to ET + abemaciclib (269 vs. 138 in the ITT population) the OS benefit seen with abemaciclib will likely increase further with longer follow-up.6
In conclusion, the addition of abemaciclib to standard-of-care ET in the adjuvant treatment of HR+/HER2–, high-risk EBC provided a persistent iDFS and DRFS benefit, with a deepening of the absolute benefit in iDFS and DRFS rates at 5 years compared to previous years. These observations are consistent with a carryover effect of adjuvant abemaciclib beyond the 2-year treatment duration, which has been previously observed in EBC with adjuvant ET alone.9 The fact that nearly one in four patients in the ET-alone arm had recurred at 5 years illustrates that the patients enrolled in this study are at very high risk of recurrence, and once again highlights the need for a more intensive adjuvant strategy in these patients.
The clinical potential of abemaciclib in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer (ABC) was evaluated in two large, randomized, phase III studies: MONARCH-2 and MONARCH-3.7,8
In MONARCH-2, a total of 669 patients with HR+/HER2- ABC were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant, or fulvestrant + placebo. To be eligible for the study, patients had to have disease progression while receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant ET, within 12 months from the end of adjuvant ET, or while receiving first-line ET in the advanced setting. Patients who received more than 1 line of ET or any prior chemotherapy for ABC were excluded from the study.6 The study convincingly met its primary endpoint by showing a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) with abemaciclib + fulvestrant than with fulvestrant + placebo (16.4 vs. 9.3 months; HR[95%CI]: 0.553[0.449-0.681]; p< 0 .001).10 Importantly, the delayed disease progression in patients receiving abemaciclib also translated into a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS. The median OS among patients who received abemaciclib + ET was reported at 46.7 months, which was 9.4 months longer than the 37.3 months median OS seen in the control arm (HR[95%CI]: 0.757[0.606-0.945]; p= 0.01). Interestingly, the OS benefit observed with abemaciclib in this study was particularly pronounced in patients with visceral disease (HR[95%CI]: 0.675[0.511-0.891]) and in patients with primary resistance to prior ET (HR[95%CI]: 0.686[0.451-1.043]).7
The phase III MONARCH-3 study evaluated the addition of abemaciclib to a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) as initial therapy for postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- ABC.7 The primary endpoint was met as the combination of abemaciclib and an NSAI resulted in a doubling of the median PFS from 14.8 months with an NSAI alone to 28.2 months with the abemaciclib combination (HR[95%CI]: 0.540[0.418-0.698]; p= 0.000002).5 After a median follow-up of 8.1 years, the median OS for patients treated with the abemaciclib-NSAI combination was reported at 66.8 months, which was 13 months longer than the 53.7 month median OS obtained with an NSAI alone (HR[95%CI]: 0.804[0.637-1.015]; p= 0.0664). While this difference did not reach the threshold for statistical significance, there is a broad consensus that the prolongation of the median OS with more than a year is clearly clinically relevant. Similar to what was described in MONARCH-2, the subgroup of patients with visceral disease at baseline derived a particularly pronounced OS benefit from the addition of abemaciclib, with an improvement of 14.9 months in median OS (63.7 vs. 48.8 months; HR[95%CI]: 0.758[0.558-1.030]). The latter is of particular interest given the fact that no numerical effect was observed in patients with liver metastases with the addition of ribociclib to letrozole in MONALEESA-2.11
Given the long post-progression survival after first-line therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, patients often receive multiple lines of therapy during the metastatic disease course. As a result, it is likely that additional lines of systemic therapies after disease progression, often including a CDKi, has contributed to a dilution of the OS effect in this study.8 Furthermore, the 13.1 month increase in median OS observed in MONARCH-2 is fairly similar to the 12.5 months median OS benefit obtained with ribociclib in the MONALEESA-2 trial in which a statistical OS benefit was demonstrated.8,11
MonarchE, MONARCH-2 and MONARCH-3 provide convincing evidence supporting the use of abemaciclib in all possible HR+/HER2- breast cancer settings in which a CDK4/6 inhibitor can be considered.6-8
An expert opinion Prof. Dr. Ahmad Awada (CHIREC, Brussels) Taking together all the available clinical trial data for abemaciclib, it is clear that this is an effective and tolerable agent for the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer, both in the early and advanced setting. Zooming in efficacy, MonarchE represents the most important step forward in the treatment of patients with HR+ breast cancer since the introduction of tamoxifen over 50 years ago. In fact, the absolute DFS benefit of 7% at 5 years is much bigger than the benefit that is provided by aromatase inhibitors in this setting. As such, abemaciclib + ET has become the undisputed standard of care for patients with high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. A question for the future will be how to treat patients with a disease relapse during, or shortly after adjuvant abemaciclib. For me personally, this has not yet been an issue as not a single one of my patients treated with the MonarchE regimen has relapsed so far. Nevertheless, it is inevitable that we will be confronted with these patients in the years to come. In this respect, I think that it is safe to re-challenge with a CDK4/6 inhibitor as long as the CDK4/6 inhibitor-free interval is longer than 12 months. In the advanced setting, the combined data from MONARCH-2 and -3 provide convincing evidence on the fact that the addition of abemaciclib to ET markedly prolongs the life of patients. This benefit seems to be particularly pronounced in patients with poor prognostic features, such as visceral metastases. For me, this finding is a reason to prefer this CDK4/6 inhibitor in patients with a more dismal prognosis. With respect to safety, it is worth underscoring that the adverse event (AE) profile of this drug differs markedly from that of the other 2 CDK4/6 inhibitors. In contrast to ribociclib and palbociclib, abemaciclib comes with a much lower risk for neutropenia. An aspect that does require some attention with abemaciclib consists of gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity. Of note, be aware that the GI toxicity may also include abdominal discomfort and nausea. Patients may suffer a couple of diarrhea episodes on one day, while being free from diarrhea for many subsequent days or weeks. |
An expert opinion Prof. Dr. Hannelore Denys (University hospital Ghent) Since the publication of MonarchE, the combination of abemaciclib and ET has become standard of care for patients with high-risk, HR+/HER2- EBC. In patients with advanced disease, MONARCH-2 demonstrated a statistically significant OS benefit, while the 13-month OS benefit in MONARCH-3 is clinically very relevant and reassuring for our patients. The OS benefit seen in this trial is similar to what was observed with ribociclib in MONALEESA-2. In contrast, no OS benefit was observed in the clinical trial program with palbociclib. Of note, real-world data presented at ASCO 2024 (PALMARES-2) seem to confirm the different potency of the different CDK4/6 inhibitors with a significantly longer real-world progression-free survival (PFS) for ribociclib and abemaciclib than with palbociclib.12 In clinical practice, abemaciclib also proves to be a tolerable agent. In this respect, it is important to educate and prepare patients for the potential GI issues that can be encountered with this agent. The oncocoach, or onconurse can play an important role in this education. Over the years we have learned to deal with diarrhea in patients under treatment with abemaciclib. For example, I pro-actively prescribe loperamide to patients allowing them to rapidly step in should they have diarrhea. In the adjuvant setting I also tend to have a lower threshold to reduce the abemaciclib dose in patients who suffer recurrent diarrhea episodes. In clinical trials you see a relatively high rate of patients who discontinued therapy without first attempting a dose reduction. For me this is a lost opportunity. In the metastatic setting, clinical trials indicated a higher risk for thrombo-embolic events, which caused some concern to use of this agent in the adjuvant setting. However, this concern proved to be unfounded and also in my clinical practice I did not encounter any thrombo-embolic issues in the adjuvant setting. |
References
Early Breast Cancer: Verzenios in combination with endocrine therapy is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence (defined by clinical and pathological features: either ≥ 4 pALN (positive axillary lymph nodes), or 1-3 pALN and at least one of the following criteria: tumor size ≥ 5 cm or histological grade 3). In pre- or perimenopausal women, aromatase inhibitor endocrine therapy should be combined with a LHRH agonist
Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: Verzenios is indicated for the treatment of women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant as initial endocrine-based therapy, or in women who have received prior endocrine therapy. In pre- or perimenopausal women, the endocrine therapy should be combined with a LHRH agonist
This material is meant only for individuals allowed by law to prescribe or deliver medicines.
Responsible publisher: ELB-Markiesstraat 1/4B Rue du Marquis – 1000 Brussels
PP-AL-BE-0384 AUGUST 2024
Hospital price | Patient price | |
MBC and EBC | ||
Verzenios® 150 mg | € 1.984,44 | € 0 |
Verzenios® 100 mg | € 1.984,44 | € 0 |
Verzenios® 50 mg | € 1.984,44 | € 0 |
MINIMAL INFORMATIONS OF THE SPC 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Verzenios 50 mg film-coated tablets Verzenios 100 mg film-coated tablets Verzenios 150 mg film-coated tablets 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Verzenios 50 mg film-coated tablets Each film-coated tablet contains 50 mg abemaciclib. Excipients with known effect Each film-coated tablet contains 14 mg of lactose monohydrate. Verzenios 100 mg film-coated tablets Each film-coated tablet contains 100 mg abemaciclib. Excipients with known effect Each film-coated tablet contains 28 mg of lactose monohydrate. Verzenios 150 mg film-coated tablets Each film-coated tablet contains 150 mg abemaciclib. Excipients with known effect Each film-coated tablet contains 42 mg of lactose monohydrate. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Film-coated tablet (tablet). Verzenios 50 mg film-coated tablets Beige, oval tablet of 5.2 x 9.5 mm, debossed with “Lilly” on one side and “50” on the other. Verzenios 100 mg film-coated tablets White, oval tablet of 6.6 x 12.0 mm, debossed with “Lilly” on one side and “100” on the other. Verzenios 150 mg film-coated tablets Yellow, oval tablet of 7.5 x 13.7 mm, debossed with “Lilly” on one side and “150” on the other. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Early breast cancer Verzenios in combination with endocrine therapy is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor (HR)‑positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‑negative, node‑positive early breast cancer at high risk of recurrence (see section 5.1). In pre‑ or perimenopausal women, aromatase inhibitor endocrine therapy should be combined with a luteinising hormone‑releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist. Advanced or metastatic breast cancer Verzenios is indicated for the treatment of women with hormone receptor (HR)‑positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‑negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant as initial endocrine-based therapy, or in women who have received prior endocrine therapy. In pre- or perimenopausal women, the endocrine therapy should be combined with a LHRH agonist. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Verzenios therapy should be initiated and supervised by physicians experienced in the use of anti‑cancer therapies. Posology The recommended dose of abemaciclib is 150 mg twice daily when used in combination with endocrine therapy. Please refer to the summary of product characteristics of the endocrine therapy combination partner for the recommended posology. Duration of treatment Early breast cancer Verzenios should be taken continuously for two years, or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Advanced or metastatic breast cancer Verzenios should be taken continuously as long as the patient is deriving clinical benefit from therapy or until unacceptable toxicity occurs. If a patient vomits or misses a dose of Verzenios, the patient should be instructed to take the next dose at its scheduled time; an additional dose should not be taken. Dose adjustments Management of some adverse reactions may require dose interruption and/or dose reduction as shown in Tables 1-7. Table 1. Dose adjustment recommendations for adverse reactions
Verzenios dose combination therapy | |
Recommended dose | 150 mg twice daily |
First dose adjustment | 100 mg twice daily |
Second dose adjustment | 50 mg twice daily |
Table 2. Management recommendations for haematologic toxicities Complete blood counts should be monitored prior to the start of Verzenios therapy, every two weeks for the first two months, monthly for the next two months, and as clinically indicated. Before treatment initiation, absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) ≥ 1 500 / mm3, platelets ≥ 1 00 000 / mm3, and haemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL are recommended.
Toxicitya, b | Management recommendations |
Grade 1 or 2 | No dose adjustment required. |
Grade 3 | Suspend dose until toxicity resolves to Grade 2 or less. Dose reduction is not required. |
Grade 3, recurrent; or Grade 4 | Suspend dose until toxicity resolves to Grade 2 or less. Resume at next lower dose. |
Patient requires administration of blood cell growth factors | Suspend abemaciclib dose for at least 48 hours after the last dose of blood cell growth factors was administered and until toxicity resolves to Grade 2 or less. Resume at next lower dose unless the dose was already reduced for the toxicity that led to the use of the growth factor. |
a NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) b ANC: Grade 1: ANC < LLN – 1 500 / mm3; Grade 2: ANC 1 000 – < 1 500 / mm3;
Grade 3: ANC 500 – < 1 000 / mm3; Grade 4: ANC < 500 / mm3 LLN = lower limit of normal Table 3. Management recommendations for diarrhoea Treatment with antidiarrhoeal agents, such as loperamide, should be started at the first sign of loose stools.
Toxicity a | Management recommendations |
Grade 1 | No dose adjustment required. |
Grade 2 | If toxicity does not resolve within 24 hours to Grade 1 or less, suspend dose until resolution. Dose reduction is not required. |
Grade 2 that persists or recurs after resuming the same dose despite maximal supportive measures | Suspend dose until toxicity resolves to Grade 1 or less. Resume at next lower dose. |
Grade 3 or 4 or requires hospitalisation |
a NCI CTCAE Table 4. Management recommendations for increased aminotransferases Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) should be monitored prior to the start of Verzenios therapy, every two weeks for the first two months, monthly for the next two months, and as clinically indicated.
Toxicitya | Management recommendations |
Grade 1 (> ULN – 3.0 x ULN) Grade 2 (> 3.0 – 5.0 x ULN) | No dose adjustment required. |
Persistent or Recurrent Grade 2, or Grade 3 (> 5.0 – 20.0 x ULN) | Suspend dose until toxicity resolves to baseline or Grade 1. Resume at next lower dose. |
Elevation in AST and/or ALT > 3 x ULN WITH total bilirubin > 2 x ULN, in the absence of cholestasis | Discontinue abemaciclib. |
Grade 4 (> 20.0 x ULN) | Discontinue abemaciclib. |
a NCI CTCAEULN = upper limit of normal Table 5. Management recommendations for interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis
Toxicitya | Management recommendations |
Grade 1 or 2 | No dose adjustment required. |
Persistent or recurrent Grade 2 toxicity that does not resolve with maximal supportive measures within 7 days to baseline or Grade 1 | Suspend dose until toxicity resolves to baseline or Grade 1. Resume at next lower dose. |
Grade 3 or 4 | Discontinue abemaciclib. |
a NCI CTCAE Table 6. Management recommendations for venous thromboembolic events (VTEs)
Toxicitya | Management recommendations |
Early breast cancer | |
All Grades (1, 2, 3, or 4) | Suspend dose and treat as clinically indicated. Abemaciclib may be resumed when the patient is clinically stable. |
Advanced or metastatic breast cancer | |
Grade 1 or 2 | No dose modification is required. |
Grade 3 or 4 | Suspend dose and treat as clinically indicated. Abemaciclib may be resumed when the patient is clinically stable. |
a NCI CTCAE Table 7. Management recommendations for non-haematologic toxicities (excluding diarrhoea, increased aminotransferases, and ILD/pneumonitis and VTEs)
Toxicity a | Management recommendations |
Grade 1 or 2 | No dose adjustment required. |
Persistent or recurrent Grade 2 toxicity that does not resolve with maximal supportive measures to baseline or Grade 1 within 7 days | Suspend dose until toxicity resolves to Grade 1 or less. Resume at next lower dose. |
Grade 3 or 4 |
a NCI CTCAE CYP3A4 inhibitors Concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors should be avoided. If strong CYP3A4 inhibitors cannot be avoided, the abemaciclib dose should be reduced to 100 mg twice daily. In patients who have had their dose reduced to 100 mg abemaciclib twice daily and in whom co‑administration of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor cannot be avoided, the abemaciclib dose should be further reduced to 50 mg twice daily. In patients who have had their dose reduced to 50 mg abemaciclib twice daily and in whom co‑administration of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor cannot be avoided, the abemaciclib dose may be continued with close monitoring of signs of toxicity. Alternatively, the abemaciclib dose may be reduced to 50 mg once daily or discontinued. If the CYP3A4 inhibitor is discontinued, the abemaciclib dose should be increased to the dose used prior to the initiation of the CYP3A4 inhibitor (after 3 to 5 half-lives of the CYP3A4 inhibitor). Special populations Elderly No dose adjustment is required based on age (see section 5.2). Renal impairment No dose adjustments are necessary in patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. There are no data regarding abemaciclib administration in patients with severe renal impairment, end stage renal disease, or in patients on dialysis (see section 5.2). Abemaciclib should be administered with caution in patients with severe renal impairment, with close monitoring for signs of toxicity. Hepatic impairment No dose adjustments are necessary in patients with mild (Child Pugh A) or moderate (Child Pugh B) hepatic impairment. In patients with severe (Child Pugh C) hepatic impairment, a decrease in dosing frequency to once daily is recommended (see section 5.2). Paediatric population The safety and efficacy of abemaciclib in children and adolescents aged less than 18 years has not been established. No data are available. Method of administration Verzenios is for oral use. The dose can be taken with or without food. It should not be taken with grapefruit or grapefruit juice (see section 4.5). Patients should take the doses at approximately the same times every day. The tablet should be swallowed whole (patients should not chew, crush, or split tablets before swallowing). 4.3 Contraindications Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1. 4.8 Undesirable effects Summary of the safety profile The most commonly occurring adverse reactions are diarrhoea, infections, neutropenia, leukopenia, anaemia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, alopecia and decreased appetite. Of the most common adverse reactions, Grade ≥ 3 events were less than 5 % with the exception of neutropenia, leukopenia, and diarrhoea. Tabulated list of adverse reactions In the following table, adverse reactions are listed in order of MedDRA body system organ class and frequency. Frequency gradings are: very common (³1 / 10), common (³1 / 100 to < 1 / 10), uncommon (³1 / 1 000 to < 1 / 100), rare (³1 / 10 000 to < 1 / 1 000), very rare (< 1 / 10 000), and not known (cannot be estimated from the available data). Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness. Table 8. Adverse reactions reported in the phase 3 studies of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapya (N = 3 559) and during post-marketing experience
System organ class | Very common | Common | Uncommon | Rare |
Infections and infestations | Infections b | |||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Neutropenia Leukopenia Anaemia Thrombocytopenia Lymphopenia h | Febrile neutropenia e | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Decreased appetite | |||
Nervous system disorders | Headache f Dysgeusia g Dizziness g | |||
Eye disorders | Lacrimation increased | Photopsia | ||
Vascular disorders | Venous thromboembolism c | |||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ILD/pneumonitis d | |||
Gastrointestinal disorders | DiarrhoeaVomiting Nausea Stomatitis f | Dyspepsia f | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Alopecia g Pruritus g Rash g | Nail disorder f Dry skin e | Erythema multiforme | |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Muscular weakness e | |||
General disorders and administration site conditions | Pyrexia e Fatigue | |||
Investigations | Alanine aminotransferase increased g Aspartate aminotransferase increased g |
a Abemaciclib in combination with anastrozole, letrozole, exemestane, tamoxifen, or fulvestrant. b Infections include all reported preferred terms that are part of the system organ class infections and infestations. c Venous thromboembolic events include deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, subclavian, axillary vein thrombosis, DVT inferior vena cava and pelvic venous thrombosis. d ILD/pneumonitis for early breast cancer (EBC) include all reported preferred terms that are part of the MedDRA SMQ interstitial lung disease. For metastatic breast cancer (mBC) preferred terms include interstitial lung disease, pneumonitis, organising pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis and bronchiolitis obliterans. e Considered ADRs in the mBC setting only (MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3). f Considered ADRs in the EBC setting only (monarchE). g Common frequency in the EBC setting (monarchE), very common in the mBC setting (MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3). h Common frequency in mBC setting (MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3), very common in the EBC setting (monarchE). Description of selected adverse reactions Neutropenia Neutropenia was reported frequently across studies. In the monarchE study, neutropenia was reported in 45.8 % of patients. Grade 3 or 4 decrease in neutrophil counts (based on laboratory findings) was reported in 19.1 % of patients receiving abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy with a median time to onset of 30 days, and median time to resolution of 16 days. Febrile neutropenia was reported in 0.3 % patients. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 studies, neutropenia was reported in 45.1 % of patients. Grade 3 or 4 decrease in neutrophil counts (based on laboratory findings) was reported in 28.2 % of patients receiving abemaciclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant. The median time to onset of Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was 29 to 33 days, and median time to resolution was 11 to 15 days. Febrile neutropenia was reported in 0.9 % patients. Dose modification is recommended for patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (see section 4.2). Diarrhoea Diarrhoea was the most commonly reported adverse reaction (see Table 8). Incidence was greatest during the first month of abemaciclib treatment and was lower subsequently. In the monarchE study, the median time to onset of the first diarrhoea event of any grade was 8 days. The median duration of diarrhoea was 7 days for Grade 2 and 5 days for Grade 3. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 studies, the median time to onset of the first diarrhoea event of any grade was approximately 6 to 8 days. The median duration of diarrhoea was 9 to 12 days for Grade 2 and 6 to 8 days for Grade 3. Diarrhoea returned to baseline or lesser grade with supportive treatment such as loperamide and/or dose adjustment (see section 4.2). Increased aminotransferases In the monarchE study, ALT and AST elevations were reported frequently (12.3 % and 11.8 %, respectively) in patients receiving abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy. Grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations (based on laboratory findings) were reported in 2.6 % and 1.6 % patients. The median time to onset of Grade 3 or 4 ALT elevation was 118 days, and median time to resolution was 14.5 days. The median time to onset of Grade 3 or 4 AST elevation was 90.5 days, and median time to resolution was 11 days. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 studies, ALT and AST elevations were reported frequently (15.1 % and 14.2 %, respectively) in patients receiving abemaciclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant. Grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST elevations (based on laboratory findings) were reported in 6.1 % and 4.2 % patients. The median time to onset of Grade 3 or 4 ALT elevation was 57 to 61 days, and median time to resolution was 14 days. The median time to onset of Grade 3 or 4 AST elevation was 71 to 185 days, and median time to resolution was 13 to 15 days. Dose modification is recommended for patients who develop Grade 3 or 4 ALT or AST increase (see section 4.2). Creatinine Although not an adverse reaction, abemaciclib has been shown to increase serum creatinine. In the monarchE study, 99.3 % of patients had serum creatinine elevations (based on laboratory findings), and of these, 0.5 % of patients had Grade 3 or 4 elevations. In patients receiving endocrine therapy alone, 91.0 % reported an increase in serum creatinine (all laboratory grades). In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3 studies, 98.3 % of patients had serum creatinine elevations (based on laboratory findings), and of these, 1.9 % of patients had Grade 3 or 4 elevations. In patients receiving an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant alone, 78.4 % reported an increase in serum creatinine (all laboratory grades). Abemaciclib has been shown to increase serum creatinine due to inhibition of renal tubular secretion transporters without affecting glomerular function (as measured by iohexol clearance) (see section 4.5). In clinical studies, increases in serum creatinine occurred within the first month of abemaciclib dosing, remained elevated but stable through the treatment period, were reversible upon treatment discontinuation, and were not accompanied by changes in markers of renal function, such as blood urea nitrogen (BUN), cystatin C, or calculated glomerular filtration rate based on cystatin C. Reporting of suspected adverse reactions Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via: Belgium : Agence fédérale des médicaments et des produits de santé, www.afmps.be, Division Vigilance: Site internet: www.notifieruneffetindesirable.be, e-mail: adr@fagg-afmps.be. Luxembourg : Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance de Nancy ou Division de la pharmacie et des médicaments de la Direction de la santé Site internet : www.guichet.lu/pharmacovigilance. 7. MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDER Eli Lilly Nederland B.V., Papendorpseweg 83, 3528BJ Utrecht, The Netherlands. 8. MARKETING AUTHORISATION NUMBER(S) EU/1/18/1307/001 EU/1/18/1307/002 EU/1/18/1307/003 EU/1/18/1307/004 EU/1/18/1307/005 EU/1/18/1307/006 EU/1/18/1307/007 EU/1/18/1307/008 EU/1/18/1307/009 EU/1/18/1307/010 EU/1/18/1307/011 EU/1/18/1307/012 EU/1/18/1307/013 EU/1/18/1307/014 EU/1/18/1307/015 EU/1/18/1307/016 EU/1/18/1307/017 EU/1/18/1307/018 EU/1/18/1307/019 EU/1/18/1307/020 EU/1/18/1307/021 9. DATE OF FIRST AUTHORISATION/RENEWAL OF THE AUTHORISATION Date of first authorisation: 27 September 2018 Date of latest renewal: 23 June 2023 10. DATE OF REVISION OF THE TEXT 17 June 2024. Detailed information on this medicinal product is available on the website of the European Medicines Agency: http://www.ema.europa.eu METHOD OF DELIVERY Medicinal product subject to restricted medical prescription.